What is a Mixed Economic System?
A mixed economic system combines aspects of multiple economic theories or systems, most commonly socialism and capitalism, to take advantage of the benefits of both.
Every economic system has its benefits and drawbacks. Some economists believe that a purely socialist society offers little incentive for innovation or entrepreneurship. Others believe that pure capitalism allows too much power to concentrate in the hands of a wealthy few. By blending different approaches, a mixed economic system seeks to capture the benefits of each while reducing their drawbacks. The systems that are combined most often are capitalism and socialism — The result is a system that permits private ownership of property and allows the government to intervene in the economy in the public interest.
Most modern economies are examples of a mixed economic system. Take the United States economy — It relies on capitalist principles like private ownership of property and individuals making decisions about the allocation of resources. At the same time, it allows for government intervention, such as anti-trust laws, which give the government the power to break up monopolies for the common good.
A mixed economic system is like making soup…
When you make soup, you combine different meats and vegetables into a single dish. You still get the individual flavors of the carrots, celery, and beef that you added to the pot, but the flavors meld together, each influencing the other and creating a new, unified flavor. A mixed economic system works in a similar way, integrating aspects of different systems, like capitalism and socialism. The result is a completely new system.
In every economic system, there are benefits and drawbacks. Take capitalism. Proponents would argue that capitalism incentivizes innovation and competition, offering more choices to consumers. Critics would say that capitalism encourages monopolies and inequality between the rich and poor.
Now take socialism. An advocate would argue that socialism can reduce inequality, benefiting society as a whole. But a critic may argue that socialism discourages innovation and leads to a stagnant economy.
In the real world, many economies run on a mix of capitalist and socialist policies. The idea is to have the best of both worlds: Gain the benefits of each system while hedging against the drawbacks of all.
For example, an economy that allows private ownership of property and means of production — Capitalist policies — may also encourage entrepreneurs to start new businesses for profit. At the same time, socialist policies, like food stamps or federal housing assistance, may offer a financial safety net for people without access to wealth or property.
The United States runs on a mixed economy that combines capitalist policies with government regulation. At the height of the 2008 financial crisis, Congress stepped in by passing the Dodd-Frank Act, which included new regulations in the banking industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act established requirements for how credit ratings are assigned to bonds. It also expanded the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), strengthened whistleblower protections, and established the Federal Insurance Office to monitor the insurance industry. This is notable because, under a purely capitalist system, such government interventions wouldn’t exist.
Here’s another example: The US Federal Housing Administration (FHA) — a government agency that provides financial assistance to people who cannot afford housing. In a purely capitalist society, the government would not assist people who need help securing housing or other basic necessities. Offering financial assistance to the poor is a policy that might be common is a socialist economy. In the United States, we see both capitalist and socialist policies co-exist in a mixed economy.
A mixed economy typically operates on a combination of capitalist and socialist policies. Many of the mixed economies we see today largely operate under free-market principles, with the government intervening during economic crises or when free-market principles appear to be harming the greater public.
The result is an economy where private entities may own the means of production (businesses, factories, industrial machines, etc.), and where an individual can run a business with profit as their only motive. At the same time, some entities are run by the government and provide a public service — Like the US Postal Service workers who deliver your mail.
In many mixed economies, the government may impose laws to control the market — Think antitrust regulations meant to prevent monopolies, or progressive taxes meant to reduce economic inequality by taxing the wealthy at a higher rate.
Mixed economies can produce almost any good. This includes necessities like food and shelter or goods that you might only find in a capitalist society, like luxury cars or rare jewelry. It also includes goods you might only find in a socialist economy, where some things exist purely for public benefit.
A free market implies that there’s little or no government influence over the economy, or the private businesses and individuals operating within it. Instead, companies work solely with a profit motive, and the prices of goods are set entirely by the market’s supply and demand. In theory, there are also no restrictions on a company’s ability to merge or form monopolies. In a free market, individuals, not the government, have the ultimate control over the economy.
In a mixed economy, the government plays a more significant role. It may impose regulations that limit monopolies or force businesses to meet certain safety requirements. Businesses may still operate with a profit motive, but they do so within the constraints set by laws created and enforced by the government.
Mixed economies are largely a product of the economic trials and tribulations throughout history, and they’ve become more common over time. One early example dates back to the British Corn Laws of the early 1800s, which regulated the import and export of grains. The laws were meant to protect local farmers against foreign competitors. But they also drove up labor and food prices. Part of the response was that many economists favored a laissez-faire approach to trade.
By the early 1900s, many economists and government officials in Western developed countries believed that a free market was the best bet to provide for the common good. But with the Great Depression, stock markets and economies around the world collapsed, exposing the flaws of free market principles. In the United States, the New Deal — A series of programs meant to help restore the economy after the Great Depression — became one of the first major government efforts to directly influence the economy and provide a social safety net for Americans.
Mixed economies also emerged in places where the government traditionally controlled the economy. In recent decades, Communist nations like Russia and China have departed from a purely centrally planned approach and adopted more capitalist principles.
Mixed economies implement some of the ideas of socialism without adopting it entirely. For example, under socialism, the public owns the means of production, meaning there’s no private ownership of business or industrial equipment. Instead, businesses are owned by all and are meant to work in service of the common good.
In a mixed economy, private individuals can own businesses and run them for profit. The government regulates the practices of businesses to protect the public interest.
The primary advantage of a mixed economy is that it allows a country to gain the benefits of free market ideals (innovation and competition) and socialist ideals (reduced inequality). A mixed economy typically rewards efficiency — Because businesses work to produce a profit, it incentivizes producers to provide goods and services at a low cost.
The disadvantage of a mixed economy is that it must be carefully managed and balanced. This is largely left up to the government, and it’s a big responsibility. Without proper checks and balances, a mixed economy can suffer from the downsides of both capitalism and socialism, such as inefficiency or inequality.
The majority of countries today have some form of mixed economy, though each country balances its mixture of capitalism and socialism in a different way. Some countries, like the United States, are known for valuing capitalist ideals more so than socialist ones. Other countries lean more heavily on socialist policies. For example, Nordic countries, including Sweden, Iceland, and Finland, are known for their significant social safety net and high levels of collective bargaining.
What is Capitalism?
What is a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan?
What is Communism?
What are bull and bear markets?
What is the Dodd-Frank Act?
What is the S&P 500?
What is the Dow?
What is Short Selling?
Short selling is an advanced trading strategy where you borrow shares of a stock, sell them at the current price, and hope the price falls so that you can repay the borrowed shares at a lower price.
What is the Accounting Equation?
The accounting equation — assets equal liabilities plus shareholder equity — is fundamental to the double-entry system that records a firm's financial transactions on balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow statements.
What is an Inheritance Tax?
An inheritance tax is a levy that some states charge against the gift someone inherits from the estate of the deceased.
What is Property?
Property is anything that a person, business, or other entity owns, meaning that they have rights over that property, such as the right to use it or deny its use.
What is Racketeering?
Racketeering is forcing someone to give up money or personal property through extortion or coercion.